site stats

Samsung galaxy a53 5g review techradar

WebApr 12, 2024 · Samsung’s Galaxy A series smartphones are among the most widely sold mid-range smartphone variants worldwide and often feature in our guides for the best affordable phones.One year after the Galaxy A53, Samsung has expectedly launched the follow-up Samsung Galaxy A54 5G.It comes with an Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset and just … WebMay 16, 2024 · View all. We have nearly identical screen sizes, though: 6.5" on the A53 5G vs 6.4" on the A33 5G, and good news is both use AMOLED tech with lush colors and excellent contrast. The difference here is refresh rate: you get the sweet 120Hz goodness for smooth scrolling on the A53 5G, while the cheaper model gets 90Hz.

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Review PCMag

WebApr 8, 2024 · The Galaxy A53 5G is a great value for $449, with a rich 6.5-inch OLED screen, large 5,000mAh battery, and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. WebJun 29, 2024 · Samsung Galaxy M53 specs at a glance: Body: 164.7x77.0x7.4mm, 176g; plastic back, plastic frame. Display: 6.70" Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 1080x2408px resolution, 20.07:9 aspect ratio, 394ppi.... chute wiltshire https://chanartistry.com

Galaxy A53 5G: At $450, It Looks Like a Midrange Powerhouse

WebJan 22, 2024 · Samsung Galaxy A52 5G review: Performance With a mid-range Snapdragon 750G chipset and 6GB RAM, the Galaxy A52 5G should offer the power you need to accomplish everyday tasks. On the... WebJun 8, 2024 · The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has ample graphics power on paper, and doesn’t do too badly in benchmarks. 3D Mark’s Wild Life test scored at 2,253, which is significantly higher than cheaper phones like the Poco X4 Pro and Realme 9. WebMar 17, 2024 · While the Galaxy A53 5G is the headline attraction here, the cheaper A33 5G still packs a number of features that aren’t always a given at this price. Design and Screen Plastic body feels... dfs hike storeaway

Galaxy A53 5G: At $450, It Looks Like a Midrange Powerhouse

Category:Galaxy A53 5G Review: You Almost Forget This Phone Costs Just …

Tags:Samsung galaxy a53 5g review techradar

Samsung galaxy a53 5g review techradar

Samsung Galaxy M53 review - GSMArena.com tests

Web7 rows · Apr 13, 2024 · The A53 5G has a 64MP, f/1.8 main camera that takes 12MP photos by default; it can also simulate ... WebNov 18, 2024 · This is Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, our full review and user experience after one quarter!Tags:Samsung Galaxy A53 in 2024! Samsung Galaxy A53 android 13! Samsung ...

Samsung galaxy a53 5g review techradar

Did you know?

WebNow spill, splash and splatter resistant. Rated IP67 for water and dust-resistance, the Galaxy A53 5G stands up to 1.0 meter of freshwater for up to 30 minutes.¹ With additional protection from Gorilla Glass 5, your device is now tougher and less prone to scratches. 1. Galaxy A53 5G is rated as IP67. WebApr 29, 2024 · Samsung has a lot of Galaxy A series phones, and sometimes picking between them can be a confusing matter. The Galaxy A33 5G shares a lot of DNA with the slightly more expensive Galaxy A53 5G. It's running the same Samsung-produced processor as its brains, which means it runs nearly identically.

WebNow spill, splash and splatter resistant. Rated IP67 for water and dust-resistance, the Galaxy A53 5G stands up to 1.0 meter of freshwater for up to 30 minutes.¹ With additional protection from Gorilla Glass 5, your device is now tougher and less prone to scratches. 1. Galaxy A53 5G is rated as IP67. WebMar 17, 2024 · The A53's starting price is also $50 cheaper than what last year's A52 cost at launch, with the A53 5G coming in a single configuration of 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, expandable up to...

WebApr 13, 2024 · The new Galaxy A53 5G is now here for review. Since the 5X series has arguably been one of the better-geared devices in the series, it is also the toughest one to upgrade. In comparison,... WebMar 28, 2024 · Considerato l’insieme, Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G rappresenta una buona offerta per circa 400 euro, ma fatica a distinguersi dai concorrenti. Ci sono infatti alternative molto convincenti, come Honor 70, Pixel 6a o Samsung Galaxy A53. Sono tutti modelli leggermente più vecchi rispetto al nuovo Redmi, ma sono equivalenti o superiori per ...

WebApr 13, 2024 · Samsung Galaxy A53 review: Display The Galaxy A53 sports a very nice 6.5-inch AMOLED display. You get FHD resolution and — best of all — a 120Hz refresh rate. A $449 phone with a 120Hz...

WebMar 17, 2024 · Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: Display. 6,5-Zoll Super AMOLED, Infinity-O Display. Full-HD+-Auflösung und eine ruckelfreie Bildwiederholfrequenz von 120 Hz. Wie wir bereits erwähnt haben, hat das Galaxy A53 ein größeres 6,5-Zoll-Display, das sich über einen … chute yeah shirtchuteworkWebSamsung Galaxy A33 5G 6GB/128GB == N236,000 – N240,000; Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 12GB/256GB == N1,435,000 – N1,450,000 ... Samsung Galaxy A53 6GB/128GB == N288,000 – N295,000; Samsung Galaxy A53 8GB/128GB == N301,000 – N305,000 ... Huawei Y9 … chut fldYou’re about to see a whole lot of two different adjectives: ‘attractive’, and ‘slow’. While conducting the testing for this Samsung Galaxy A53 review, we found many aspects of the phone could easily be described by one of those two adjectives. The A53 is, for all intents and purposes, a 'lite' version of the Samsung … See more chutex international co. ltdWebAnonymous, 06 Apr 2024 The big difference is the front design were the a33 has a u notch and a53 a punch hole you forgot below. front cam pixel. refresh rate. AOD. NFC for indian market. may be ... dfs higher seat level sofasWebSamsung Galaxy A53 5G - user opinions and reviews. A53 is by no means a very bad phone. I get about 6-7 hours of sot with 20-25% battery remaining (I charge my device upto 85%) Camera is great ... chutex holdingWebApr 7, 2024 · The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a good phone overall for someone who doesn't. No Result . View All Result . REVIEWS. No Result . View All Result . Samsung Galaxy A53 5G review: playing with the idea of value for money. by Victoria C. April 7th. in Mobile & Smartphones, Samsung. A A. A A. dfshim.dll is not a valid win32 application